debugging io semaphore handling upon sudden abortion

This commit is contained in:
hyunghwan.chung 2019-08-29 15:18:59 +00:00
parent 652f13246f
commit 584e7f121e

View File

@ -850,7 +850,11 @@ static moo_oop_process_t signal_semaphore (moo_t* moo, moo_oop_semaphore_t sem)
/* i should decrement the counter as long as the group being
* signaled contains an IO semaphore */
if (MOO_OOP_TO_SMOOI(sg->sem_io_count) > 0) moo->sem_io_wait_count--;
if (MOO_OOP_TO_SMOOI(sg->sem_io_count) > 0)
{
MOO_DEBUG1 (moo, "decrementing 77 sem_io_wait_count. IO %zd\n", MOO_OOP_TO_SMOOI(sem->u.io.handle));
moo->sem_io_wait_count--;
}
return proc;
}
}
@ -895,7 +899,11 @@ static moo_oop_process_t signal_semaphore (moo_t* moo, moo_oop_semaphore_t sem)
unchain_from_semaphore (moo, proc);
resume_process (moo, proc);
if (sem->subtype == MOO_SMOOI_TO_OOP(MOO_SEMAPHORE_SUBTYPE_IO)) moo->sem_io_wait_count--;
if (sem->subtype == MOO_SMOOI_TO_OOP(MOO_SEMAPHORE_SUBTYPE_IO))
{
MOO_DEBUG1 (moo, "decrementing 88 sem_io_wait_count. IO %zd\n", MOO_OOP_TO_SMOOI(sem->u.io.handle));
moo->sem_io_wait_count--;
}
/* return the resumed(runnable) process */
return proc;
@ -950,7 +958,11 @@ static MOO_INLINE void await_semaphore (moo_t* moo, moo_oop_semaphore_t sem)
MOO_ASSERT (moo, sem->waiting.last == proc);
if (sem->subtype == MOO_SMOOI_TO_OOP(MOO_SEMAPHORE_SUBTYPE_IO)) moo->sem_io_wait_count++;
if (sem->subtype == MOO_SMOOI_TO_OOP(MOO_SEMAPHORE_SUBTYPE_IO))
{
MOO_DEBUG1 (moo, "incrementing 111 sem_io_wait_count. IO %zd\n", MOO_OOP_TO_SMOOI(sem->u.io.handle));
moo->sem_io_wait_count++;
}
MOO_ASSERT (moo, moo->processor->active != proc);
}
@ -1009,6 +1021,7 @@ static MOO_INLINE moo_oop_t await_semaphore_group (moo_t* moo, moo_oop_semaphore
{
/* there might be more than 1 IO semaphores in the group
* but i increment moo->sem_io_wait_count by 1 only */
MOO_DEBUG0 (moo, "incrementing 222 sem_io_wait_count. IO groupd\n");
moo->sem_io_wait_count++;
}
@ -2981,6 +2994,7 @@ static moo_pfrc_t pf_semaphore_group_add_semaphore (moo_t* moo, moo_mod_t* mod,
/* TODO: add sem_wait_count to process. no traversal... */
for (wp = sg->waiting.first; (moo_oop_t)wp != moo->_nil; wp = wp->sem_wait.next)
{
MOO_DEBUG0 (moo, "incrementing 333 sem_io_wait_count. IO\n");
moo->sem_io_wait_count++;
}
}
@ -3068,6 +3082,7 @@ static moo_pfrc_t pf_semaphore_group_remove_semaphore (moo_t* moo, moo_mod_t* mo
/* TODO: add sem_wait_count to process. no traversal... */
for (wp = rcv->waiting.first; (moo_oop_t)wp != moo->_nil; wp = wp->sem_wait.next)
{
MOO_DEBUG0 (moo, "decrementing 99 sem_io_wait_count. IO group\n");
moo->sem_io_wait_count--;
}
}
@ -4818,15 +4833,27 @@ static MOO_INLINE int switch_process_if_needed (moo_t* moo)
{
moo_ntime_t ft;
MOO_ASSERT (moo, moo->processor->runnable.count == MOO_SMOOI_TO_OOP(0));
/* no runnable process while there is an io semaphore being waited for */
if ((moo_oop_t)moo->sem_gcfin != moo->_nil && moo->sem_gcfin_sigreq) goto signal_sem_gcfin;
do
if (moo->processor->suspended.count == MOO_SMOOI_TO_OOP(0))
{
MOO_INIT_NTIME (&ft, 3, 0); /* TODO: use a configured time */
vm_muxwait (moo, &ft);
/* no suspended process. the program is buggy or is probably being
* terminated forcibly.
* the default signal handler may lead to this situation. */
moo->abort_req = 1;
}
else
{
do
{
MOO_INIT_NTIME (&ft, 3, 0); /* TODO: use a configured time */
vm_muxwait (moo, &ft);
}
while (moo->processor->active == moo->nil_process && !moo->abort_req);
}
while (moo->processor->active == moo->nil_process && !moo->abort_req);
}
else
{